Homestead
White and deep forest green with sage. Natural, calm, and built around a property search rather than a brochure.
Estate agents, lettings & developers
Two designs you can browse, built for agents, lettings firms and developers. Pick one and we start there.
Rightmove sells the houses. Your website wins the instructions, and those are worth considerably more.
You will lose. Chase valuations instead.
The highest-value action on the site, usually buried in the nav.
Lettings is recurring revenue. Most agent sites ignore it.
Last season's stock reads as a dying agency.
Design directions
Each one has a name. Tell us which and we start there.
Concept designs with invented brands, to show the direction. Every site we have actually built is in our case studies.
Design library
Scroll through, and switch between desktop and mobile to see how each one adapts.
Tell us which one and we start there. Harry will be in touch.
The brief
It is the money page. Treat it like one.
Different pitch, different fees, different worries.
Local knowledge is what you are actually selling.
Wired to your CRM, not updated by hand.
Lettings especially. Vagueness costs instructions.
Property is still a relationship business.
Want more than a website?
Website, CRM, automations, AI chatbot, email marketing, Google and Meta ads, branding and hosting — built and wired together so you can get on with running the business.
Fast Track Leasing runs on it and gets around five enquiries a day from search, with nothing spent on ads.
See the package for estate agents, lettings & developersA prominent valuation request, a separate route for landlords, area guides that demonstrate genuine local knowledge, live listings fed from your CRM, and clear fee information. The strategic point matters more than any of the individual pieces: your website is not competing with Rightmove for buyers, it is competing with rival agents for instructions. Design it around the valuation, not the property search.
Yes, and for a different reason than most assume. Portals bring you applicants; your website brings you instructions. A vendor choosing between three agents will look at all three websites, and that comparison often decides who gets the valuation. Portals also charge you for leads you could partly generate yourself, which makes owned search visibility worth real money over a year.
Make the request the most obvious action on every page, ask for as little as possible up front, and support it with area content that proves you know the market. Instant online valuation tools generate volume but poorer quality leads; a simple request form with fast human follow-up usually converts better into actual instructions, because the follow-up is where the relationship starts.
Usually yes. Most agency systems provide a feed, and we can pull listings from it so the site stays current without anyone updating it by hand. This matters more than it sounds: stale listings are the fastest way to look like an agency in decline, and manual updating is the first thing to slip when everyone is busy.
Give landlords their own journey rather than a link buried in the navigation. Their concerns are completely different from a vendor's: yields, compliance, void periods, tenant quality, and how much of the hassle you actually take off them. Clear service tiers with honest fees, plus content on the compliance burden, tends to work well because that burden keeps growing and landlords keep looking for someone to carry it.
Pages about the places you cover, including schools, transport, typical prices and what living there is actually like. They work when they are genuinely written by someone who knows the area, and they fail when they are spun from Wikipedia. Done properly they rank for searches like living in Shrewsbury or best areas to live in Telford, which reach people at the very beginning of a move, long before they have chosen an agent.
For lettings, transparency rules require certain fee information to be displayed, including in online listings. For sales it is a commercial choice, and the trend is firmly towards openness, with vendors increasingly expecting at least a structure or a range. Being vague rarely protects the fee. It usually just moves the conversation to an agent who was straightforward about it.
Yes, and it is a genuinely different brief. Developers are selling a scheme rather than a service, so the site needs plot availability, specification, CGIs, location context and often a reservation route. It usually works best as its own site per development, with the developer's corporate site sitting behind it rather than trying to do both jobs at once.
People looking for this page also search for
Tell us which design you liked and what your customers actually need. Harry will be in touch.
What are you looking for?