Cadence
Near-black navy with a mint accent. Product-led SaaS, showing the software rather than describing it.
Promoters, venues & ticketing
Three designs you can browse, and one live ticketing platform we built. Pick one and we start there.
Yes. A payment provider handles the card side, which is the part worth outsourcing, and everything else stays with you: the checkout sits on your own domain in your own branding, the e-ticket goes out instantly, and the buyer's details land in your records rather than a platform's. You still pay card processing fees, as everyone does, but not a per-ticket cut on top, and you keep the customer list.
An event website has a deadline the business does not. It has to be ready before the on-sale, convince somebody in the thirty seconds after they see the poster, and take the money without sending them somewhere else to do it.
That last part is where most of the money goes. Third-party ticketing takes a cut of every sale, puts its own branding over your checkout, and keeps the customer list you spent years building.
Your poster, your audience, somebody else's checkout and somebody else's fee.
You cannot email last month's crowd about next month's event.
That is where people see the poster and decide.
Instagram, the flyer, the radio spot. One of them worked.
Design directions
Each one has a name. Tell us which and we start there.
Concept designs with invented brands. The client sites below are real and clickable.
Design library
Scroll through, and switch between desktop and mobile to see how each one adapts.
Tell us which one and we start there. Harry will be in touch.
The brief
On your domain, in your branding, with the fee staying with you.
Early bird, standard, on the door, without anyone remembering to switch them.
Before they have put their phone back in their pocket.
Scanning or a searchable list, on a phone, with patchy signal.
So next time you spend the budget where it sold tickets.
Past events are proof, and they keep earning in search.
Real work, live right now
Live websites you can click into and use.
An independent promoter who was paying a fee on every ticket and sending fans to a third-party checkout. They now sell their own tickets, on their own domain, and keep the customer list.
Tell us where you are now. We'll come back with honest options.
Yes, and it is usually the point. A payment provider handles the card side, which is the part that genuinely needs to be outsourced, and everything else stays with you: the checkout sits on your own domain in your own branding, the e-ticket goes out instantly, and the buyer's details land in your records rather than a platform's. You still pay card processing fees, because everyone does, but not a per-ticket cut on top.
Work it out on your own numbers rather than ours, because it depends entirely on volume and ticket price. Take last year's ticket count, multiply by the fee and the percentage your platform charges, and compare that with building something you own. For promoters doing regular nights the answer is usually obvious. For somebody running two events a year it often is not, and we will say so.
Each tier has its own price and its own allocation, and it closes when either the allocation sells out or the date passes, whichever comes first. The important part is that it happens on its own. Tiers that rely on somebody logging in to switch them off at midnight are how an early bird price ends up honoured all month.
Whoever is on the door needs to confirm a ticket is real and has not already been used, on a phone, often with bad signal and a queue forming. That means a scan or a searchable list that works without a perfect connection. It is the least glamorous part of a ticketing build and the one that causes the most trouble when it is an afterthought.
Yes, and not only for search. An event with its own page can be shared, can rank, and still exists afterwards as evidence that the night happened and was good. Promoters who edit one page over and over throw away the proof every time, and start from nothing with each on-sale.
Refunds go back through the payment provider, which is the sane way to do it. Postponements are the harder case, because every ticket holder has to be told and some will want their money back regardless. We build the list and the route to contact it, and the policy decision stays yours, which it has to.
Earlier than most people think, because the deadline is not the launch, it is the on-sale. A build is a few weeks. What catches people out is content: the line-up, the images, the ticket tiers and the terms all have to be settled before any of it can go live, and that is usually what runs late.
Yes. The mechanics are the same whether somebody is buying entry to a night out, a seat on a course or a place at a fundraiser: tiers, a limit, a confirmation, and a way to check people in. The tone and the design change completely, which is a design question rather than a technical one.
People looking for this page also search for
Tell us which design you liked and what your customers actually need. Harry will be in touch.
What are you looking for?